QUOTE OF THE DAY

The Greek Easter

Class A1

Alexopoulos John
Apostolou Chris
Zygoulis John
Karakostas Dimitris

The basic period of Greek Easter is the Holy Week. The first three days, Holy Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, the housewives start their preparations to be ready for the Easter Sunday. They clean their houses and paint the front pavements white. They make cookies and "tsourekia" (a traditional sweet betweet bread and cake).

What's more, in these days godfathers and godmothers visit their godchildren and offer them their presents, new shoes and clothes, a chocolate egg and a caddle.

Every evening we go to church to listen to the gospels narrating the Passions of Jesus Christ.
On Holy Thursday we paint the eggs red, which is a symbol of Jesus sacrifice in order to save us. Holy Friday is the saddest day of the year for all the christians. It is the day of His Crusifiction. On Holy Saturday we all go to church to celebrate Jesus' Resurection.

And then comes Easter!!!

A glorious celebration with a lot of food (traditional lamb), drink, singing and dancing !!!!

TELECONFERENCE

CLASS: A2

Today, we had a teleconference with the Open Government Partnership (OGP).

The programme Δι@γεια introduces for the first time in Greece the meaning of "clarification" in all aspects of Public Administration, forming a new "social contract" among the citizen and the state.
It was a very constructive tele - discussion between 12 schools in Greece. Our school, under the guidance of Ms Tsoutsika, had the opportunity to submit some questions regarding the nature and the purposes of the programme.

It was a really interesting teleconference!

(http:/et.diavgeia.gov.gr)

Στον τελικό του Ν.Φθιώτιδας το Λύκειο Στυλίδας!

2/4/2014

Ό,τι και να πούμε για το Λύκειο Στυλίδας πλέον είναι λίγο!

Μετά την απόλυτα επιτυχημένη περσινή πορεία του στο πανελλήνιο σχολικό πρωτάθλημα ποδοσφαίρου όπου κατέκτησε την 3η θέση ,φέτος το Λύκειο Στυλίδας έχει βάλει πάλι υψηλούς στόχους και βήμα βήμα τους πραγματοποιεί!

Σήμερα στο γήπεδο του Αμουρίου έπαιξε στον πρώτο ημιτελικό της Φθιώτιδας με το 3ο Λύκειο Λαμίας και βέβαια πάλι τα κατάφερε!

Με  γκολ του Χρήστου Σύρμου στο 1ο ημίχρονο και του Γιάννη Βαρυπάτη στο 2ο, το Λύκειο Στυλίδας πήρε το τελικό 2-0!

Μέσα στις επόμενες ημέρες θα παίξει στο μεγάλο τελικό με το νικητή του αυριανού δευτέρου ημιτελικού μεταξύ του Λυκείου της Ελάτειας και του 4ου Λυκείου Λαμίας.

ΚΑΛΗ ΣΥΝΕΧΕΙΑ ΠΑΙΔΙΑ ! ΝΑ ΣΑΣ ΔΟΥΜΕ ΠΑΛΙ ΠΡΩΤΑΘΛΗΤΕΣ ΦΘΙΩΤΙΔΑΣ !

The Best April Fools’ Pranks Ever

• Dan Fletcher and Olivia B. Waxman

March 31, 2014. TIME MAGAZINE

A look back at the wittiest, most believable April 1 gags throughout history

 

The Spaghetti Tree – 1957

 

Switzerland is known for banks and chocolate, not spaghetti, right? Tell that to the millions who fell victim to a BBC April Fools’ report touting the bumper harvests from Swiss spaghetti trees. The report, which ran three minutes, even led some to ask how they could have a spaghetti tree of their own. The Beeb’s response? Put a strand of spaghetti in tomato sauce and “hope for the best.”

 Do-It-Yourself Color TV – 1962

 

Color television wasn’t widespread until 1966, but some Swedes armed with nylon stockings tried to get it four years earlier. They fell victim to a hoax by Sweden’s Sveriges Television, which trotted out a “technical expert” to explain on-air — in thoroughly technical terms — how a thinly stretched nylon screen in front of a television would bend light’s wavelengths and produce a color image. The thousands who tried it learned quickly that there was no such trick — and were out a pair of stockings to boot.

Planetary Alignment – 1976

The British media have a unique affinity for pulling April Fools’ pranks, matched only by the British public’s unique ability to fall for them. On April 1, 1976, BBC Radio 2 astronomer Sir Patrick Moore gave listeners some bunk about how, at 9:47 a.m., Pluto and Jupiter would align in such a way as to temporarily reduce Earth’s gravity. Moore told listeners to jump at exactly that time to experience the once-in-a-lifetime effect. At 9:48, callers flooded the lines, eager to describe how they had briefly floated. News that Moore had played them no doubt brought everyone crashing back to earth.

An American in England (and back to America)

Ta-Ta, London. Hello, Awesome.

By SARAH LYALL

Published: August 17, 2013 117 Comments

EVEN after 18 years, I never really knew where I stood with the English. Why did they keep apologizing? (Were they truly sorry?) Why were they so unenthusiastic about enthusiasm? Why was their Parliament full of classically educated grown-ups masquerading as unruly schoolchildren?

Why did rain surprise them? Why were they still obsessed by the Nazis? Why were they so rude about Scotland and Wales, when they all belonged to the same, very small country? And — this was the hardest question of all — what lay beneath their default social style, an indecipherable mille-feuille of politeness, awkwardness, embarrassment, irony, self-deprecation, arrogance, defensiveness and deflective humor?

Now that my spell as a foreign correspondent for The New York Times has ended and I’ve come back home — if a place counts as home when you’ve been away for so long — I’ve had some time to think about how Britain and America have changed, and how I have. 

When I got to London, it was a calmer time. The only terrorists anyone worried about were the ones from Ireland. Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative revolution was winding down. Princess Diana had yet to reveal that there were three people in her marriage. David Beckham had yet to learn that he could make extra money by posing alluringly in his underpants

I resolved to hang on to my own accent, mainly by watching a lot of American TV, and to assimilate as best I could while remembering where I came from. What happens then is that you begin to see through the looking glass from both sides. I began to understand how America appeared from 3,000 miles away — not just the things Britons admired, but the things they didn’t. 

And so a country where even Conservatives are proud of the nationalized health service cannot comprehend a system that leaves tens of millions of people unable to afford basic health care. A country that all but banned guns after the slaughter of 16 small children in Scotland in 1996 cannot understand why some Americans’ response to mass shootings is to argue for more gun rights, not fewer.

Britons admire and consume American culture, but feel threatened by and angry at its excesses and global dominance. They are both envious and suspicious of Americans’ ease and confidence in themselves. They want American approval but feel bad about seeking it. Like a teenager worried that his more popular friend is using him for extra math help but will snub him in the cafeteria, they are unduly exercised by the “special relationship”. 

Also, Britons are not automatically impressed by what I always thought were attractive American qualities — straightforwardness, openness, can-doism, for starters — and they suspect that our surface friendly optimism might possibly be fake. (I suspect that sometimes they might possibly be right.) Once, in an experiment designed to illustrate Britons’ unease with the way Americans introduce themselves in social situations (in Britain, you’re supposed to wait for the host to do it), I got a friend at a party we were having to go up to a man he had never met. “Hi, I’m Stephen Bayley,” my friend said, sticking out his hand.

“Is that supposed to be some sort of joke?” the man responded.

Sometimes in London I felt stupidly enthusiastic, like a Labrador puppy let loose in an antique store, or overly loud and gauche, like a guest who shows up at a memorial service wearing a Hawaiian shirt and traumatizes the mourners with intrusive personal questions.

Britain became more American while I lived there — everyone did, thanks to the Internet and the global economy. By this spring, 25 percent of the adult population was obese, and doctors were calling the country “the fat man of Europe.”

But the British character lay underneath it all, and that never changed. Many of the stories I covered had to do with the question Britons have asked themselves incessantly since their empire fell: Who are we, and what is our place in the world? It wasn’t until the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games last summer, with its music medleys and dancing nurses and quotes from Shakespeare and references to Mary Poppins and sly inclusion of the queen and depictions of the Industrial Revolution and compendiums of key moments in British television history, that the country seemed to have found some sort of answer. 

It was a bold, ecstatic celebration of all sorts of things — individuality, creativity, quirkiness, sense of humor, playfulness, rebelliousness and competence in the face of potential chaos — and more than anything I have ever seen, it seemed to sum up what was great about Britain.

AMERICA has always been secure about its place in the world, though its self-belief is fraying a bit. But while Britain was figuring itself out, America was changing, too.

I’ve come back often, so it’s not like it was a total shock. But while I wasn’t paying attention, Arizona for some reason got its own Major League Baseball team. New York City’s center of gravity shifted to Brooklyn, at least according to the people who live in Brooklyn.

In other developments, available phone numbers ran out, forcing the introduction of unpleasant new area codes. “Awesome” went from being a risible word used only by stoners and surfers to an acceptably ubiquitous modifier, the Starbucks of adjectives.

The Kardashians arrived and would not leave. 

After years of using pound and euro coins, I find dollar bills cumbersome and idiotic. After years of living happily among Britons who by New York standards would be considered functioning alcoholics, I now find my old friends’ tendency to order wine by the glass, not the bottle, unnecessarily Puritanical.

I’ve grown accustomed to British friends who, when it comes to personal matters, don’t ask much, don’t tell much and really, really, don’t want to get into it. We lived for more than 15 years next to a couple who corresponded with us almost exclusively by letter. I have become an expert in the art of the anodyne weather discussion. I’m chronically sorry.

“Sorry,” I said to a Metro-North conductor the other day, when I disrupted the swift completion of his progression through the train by asking what time we would get to my stop. “No problem,” he said, looking surprised at my apology, and so I apologized again, for apologizing.

It is enough to make your head spin. There I was at the Apple store the other day, asking basic technical questions and trying not to take up too much of anyone’s mental space. I told the salesclerk that I had to change my address, since I’d just moved back.

He asked me a million questions: Why? Where was I going to live? How about my family? How did I feel?

He considered the whole thing for a moment — me, the move, New York, life. 

“Awesome!” he said. And I think he really meant it. 

-Sarah Lyall is a writer at large for The New York Times and the author of “The Anglo Files: A Field Guide to the British.”